CLICK ON THE TITLES
below for more about Aimee's books & work.

Novels
FLASH HOUSE
a suspenseful novel of rescue and redemption set in Central Asia at the start of the Cold War, featuring two unforgettable heroines whose fates are irrevocably intertwined.
CLOUD MOUNTAIN
The unforgettable tale of star-crossed love that spans four decades and two continents.
FACE
A young photographer wrestles with her repressed past and identity as an Amerasian in New York's Chinatown. Now back in print after more than a decade, FACE is Aimee's first novel.
Craft & Criticism
"FOR WRITERS ONLY" NOTES ON CRAFT & THE WRITING LIFE
Resources and suggestions for students and fellow writers
BOOK REVIEWS
Aimee's latest book reviews
Work on Eating Disorders
GAINING: The Truth About Life After Eating Disorders
How do anorexia and bulimia impact life AFTER recovery? GAINING is one of the first books about eating disorders to connect the latest scientific insights to the personal truth of life before, during, and especially after anorexia and bulimia.
SOLITAIRE A Memoir of Anorexia
America's first memoir of anorexia, and one of the earliest books about eating disorders, originally published in 1979
Recent Essays
FOR KEEPS: Women Tell the Truth About Their Bodies, Growing Older, and Acceptance "Dead Bone"
A new anthology about women's lifelong relationships with their bodies.
WHY I'M STILL MARRIED "A Great Wall"
Love springs from an improbable meeting on the Great Wall of China.
MY CALIFORNIA "Transients in Paradise"
Beverly Hills from the inside out. All sales from this anthology benefit the California Arts Council.
Short Story
MEETING ACROSS THE RIVER "The Other Side"
Aimee's short story "The Other Side" appears in this anthology of stories inspired by Bruce Springsteen's song "Meeting Across the River."

EVENTS+PRESS

If you have aging parents or a family that's spread out across the country, read this!
Aimee weighs in on how her family stays in touch.






Author, educator, advocate.
Click the links & get to know Aimee.

HOT OFF THE PRESS


READ ON: Aimee online and in print

FOR KEEPS reviewed in Martha Stewart's BODY + SOUL Magazine January/February 2008, Issue #23
LEARNING TO LOVE THE BODY
Women writers on celebrating the imperfections

[DEAD BONE is Aimee's essay within the anthology]

Some anthologies suffer from too much of the same thing. But in For Keeps: Women Tell the Truth About Their Bodies, Growing Older, and Acceptance (Seal Press), editor Victoria Zackheim has brought together writers from a range of ages and cultural experiences on the subject of living in a female body. Novelist Elizabeth Rosner becomes an artist’s model in an attempt to make peace with her body, to try and see it simply as “contours and dimensions, a graceful and anonymous arc in space.” Writer Carrie Kabak decides that cutting off ties with her criticizing mother—who is familiar with “every eyelash, every mold and freckle”—is the only way to make her body her own. Other essays deals with injury, illness, and other major failings of the physical being. Some women become athletes, pushing their bodies beyond what they thought capable, while some watch their bodies crumble and degenerate from a lifetime of pushing. This surprising collection is full of moving takes on aging gracefully in a female body.

An interview with Aimee
in ELLE Magazine.
March 2007 (pages 424 - 425)

Aimee discussses Gaining
PEOPLE MAGAZINE
March 5, 2007

LISTEN IN: Podcasts and Radio Interviews

WATCH IT: Streaming video

LIVE & LEARN: Aimee in the classroom

* * *


A CONVERSATION WITH AIMEE LIU ABOUT HER LATEST WORK: GAINING


Q: How did you come to write GAINING?

A: I began this book after a brief relapse warned me that I still didn’t understand why I had developed my adolescent eating disorder, much less what it meant in the larger context of my life. Also, I’d noticed that the personalities of my classmates who had eating disorders in school remained strikingly similar to mine even decades after we recovered – what explained that? Shortly after I began my research for the book I entered Bennington College’s MFA program, and the first section of GAINING became my Masters thesis.


Q: How is GAINING a sequel to your first book about anorexia, Solitaire?

A: In GAINING, I trace my personal story forward from the turning point that concluded Solitaire. What I could not explain all those years ago was how one recovers. I could not explain it because I still confused gaining weight with gaining control over the psychological aspects of the illness. I didn’t realize back then that the process of recovery is much more complex – and interesting! – than eating well.

So, I not only pick up my story from the moment at 19 when I “decided to get better,” but I also follow up with my classmates from those days to see how their lives have unfolded and what aspects of their eating disorders persist. Most important of all, I met with some of the world’s leading eating disorder researchers to find out what science knows now that we didn’t know at the time of my turning point.

I consider my book a sort of nonfiction mystery: it reveals, finally, why my friends and I so willingly surrendered to our tormenting obsessions all those years ago, how we each freed ourselves, and what shadow effects of our self-destruction still lingered, even decades after the fact.


Q: What was your most surprising discovery during your research?

A: I’ve long observed that people with histories of anorexia and bulimia share certain core personality traits, but when I checked with UCLA researcher Dr. Michael Strober, I was astonished to learn that the reason for these similarities is genetic. I’d assumed the parallels were due to similar family dynamics, or cultural conditioning, or the physiological effects of the eating disorders. Dr. Strober pointed me to the wealth of new research proving that the reason these people have such similar temperaments lies in their DNA. One study, for instance, showed that traits such as perfectionism, inflexibility, self- doubt, cautiousness, and a need for rules and order had been prevalent among women with eating disorders for years before they ever got sick. Even more astounding to me, however, was the almost total absence of these traits among women who were matched for age and intelligence but had never had an eating disorder. Clearly, the causes of anorexia and bulimia involve more than fashion’s emphasis on thinness or fad diets.

Q: You interviewed more than 40 women – and men – of various ages, sexual preferences, and ethnicities. How did you get them to talk intimately about such a personal issue?

A: Not everyone I contacted from my youth was willing to talk, and few were willing to be interviewed on the record. There is still such shame associated with these illnesses. I find this very sad. It’s comparable to people with diabetes or a familial predisposition to cancer being ashamed of their illness. Eating disorders are biologically based illnesses, yet the common perception is still that the anorexic or bulimic is somehow at fault – as if she chooses to be sick. To get people to open up for this book, I promised anonymity, which included changing the identifying details of their lives.

They were further encouraged when they realized how many core habits, perceptions, and struggles we had shared throughout our lives. Even in their forties, some of my interviewees still suffered from the belief that they alone shied away from intimacy, or were terrified by conflict, or felt trapped by the compulsion to be perfect, or turned to weight loss as a form of comfort when under intense stress. Most of those I interviewed kept these tendencies secret because they were ashamed. The recognition that they were not alone was a powerful incentive to share their stories in GAINING, as was our shared hope that the book may help others.


Q: You also talked to researchers all over the world about their discoveries about eating disorders. How did you gain access to them? Was it a challenge to translate their work into layman’s terms for the book?

A: Eating disorder research is a relatively small but growing and fascinating field. I found most of these busy scientists eager to talk about their findings. They want to spread the word that our understanding of these disorders is dramatically changing. So I attended their conferences, interviewed them at their offices, studied their published papers. I was grateful for the years I’d spent co-authoring books on child development and other psychological topics! That background helped me decipher the sometimes daunting scientific language.

But what fueled me was my own need to understand how this new information related to my history and to the stories my subjects were relating to me. How did the new science change my old assumptions about eating disorders? When viewed through this new lens, what could my history of anorexia teach me about myself now? These were the questions that urged me forward in my work on GAINING. I was tremendously gratified by the endorsements of the researchers who reviewed my completed manuscript before publication, and particularly by my subsequent appointment to the newly formed Advisory Board of the Academy for Eating Disorders.


Q: Why should someone who has never suffered from anorexia or bulimia read your book?

A: Most of us have friends, colleagues, or family members who struggle with eating disorders. GAINING is an attempt to make sense of their behavior – behavior that, on the surface, makes no sense or is downright perverse. My hope is that the insights readers gain will empower them as friends, teachers, doctors, or relatives to get those who are suffering the help they need.

Beyond such specific relevance, however, I hope readers will realize that our culture’s preoccupation with superficial looks-based “perfection” has helped to create a psychological cage for millions of gifted and intelligent women and, increasingly, men. Society is deprived of the full energy and talent of anyone who obsesses about whether she is thin or fit or youthful enough to meet the artificial standards set by air-brushed celebrities and supermodels. By unlocking our selves, we unleash our power to change the world. This ultimate message of GAINING applies to us all.


Q: Do you consider yourself to be truly recovered from anorexia now? What are the key components of long-term recovery?

A: I do consider myself fully recovered. While I will always have a biological vulnerability, I have learned the warning signs and preventive actions to avoid backsliding. But it has taken me a long time to reach this state, so my first advice to those who are wrestling with active eating disorders is to seek help immediately from a doctor or therapist who specializes in treating these conditions. Reaching and maintaining a healthy weight is essential, because a malnourished brain cannot function properly.

Beyond the initial stage, however, long-term recovery depends on the cultivation of genuine self-awareness; friends and loved ones who see you accurately and accept you, flaws and all; the ability to laugh at yourself, or at least not take yourself too seriously; goals and passions that you choose not out of fear or obligation but out of a sense of interest and joy; and a willingness to accept the world’s complexities, imperfections, and contradictions without judging them good or bad, perfect or disgusting, ideal or intolerable.

Finally, recovery depends on our accepting the inevitability of change, through growth, experimentation, setbacks as well as progress, and ultimately through the natural course of aging. Without change there is no life. This is why that inflexible ideal of perfection is such a dangerous obsession.


Q: What advice would you give to mothers of pre-teen daughters, who are immersed in a culture that worships stick-thin celebrities?

A: First, model healthy body acceptance, eating habits, and self-awareness, and talk with your child openly and candidly about these issues – keeping judgment out of the conversation. Second, recognize that every child is different, with her own unique temperament and instincts. Respect those differences and, when necessary, adjust your responses. Children who are prone to eating disorders are often very stubborn and sensitive. They need to be gently helped to develop flexibility, resilience, and a sense of humor about themselves and the world around them. They need to develop the coping skills to manage anxiety and keep their problems in perspective.

These skills are especially critical during the emotionally turbulent pre-teen and teen years, when anxiety often leads to imitation of those stick-thin celebrities and other superficially “perfect” ideals. Remind your daughter as often as necessary that no one is perfect. Refraining from judgment, keeping the lines of communication open, and being available to listen accurately and honestly are crucial at this time. Finally, remember that your job as a parent is to help your child separate from you and survive on her own. Encourage her to make her own good decisions by giving her meaningful choices. Trust her to develop her own strong sense of self. This involves a gradual process of letting go while also being “on call” if she needs you. It’s a tender balance! You may need to remind yourself that there’s no such thing as a “perfect” parent, either.


Q: You’re also an author of several novels. How has your struggle with anorexia influenced or impacted your fiction?

A: In retrospect, I realize that many of the currents running through my new book have also run through my novels. So, while none of my fiction has dealt explicitly with eating disorders, my stories have revolved around issues of identity and the quest for a solid sense of self. We write what we know! My main characters have had a variety of obsessions, but all have been temperamentally intense and persistent. These qualities, I understand now, are related to the same qualities that underscored my anorexia.

###

For an interview with Aimee Liu, please contact: Megan U. Beatie, Goldberg McDuffie Communications, (310) 576-3051 or mbeatie@​goldbergmcduffie.com.
Get Aimee's complete calendar by clicking on her name below...


IS YOUR BOOK GROUP INTERESTED IN A TELEPHONE OR ONLINE CHAT WITH AIMEE?

Author phone conversations with book groups usually last about 15 minutes and require that you have a speakerphone.

First, the book group discussion leader needs to schedule a chat using the link below. Please state possible times and dates for the conversation. Please send the phone number to be used during the call. After confirming date and time through e-mail, Aimee will call you at her own expense.



BOOK GROUP DISCUSSION QUESTIONS... by book title


FLASH HOUSE


1. In the opening pages, Kamla states that “Joanna Shaw rescued me in her way, and I tried to return the favor.” How and why did Joanna need to be “rescued,” or was that need only in Kamla’s mind? Was Kamla successful in her attempt to return the favor?

2. Joanna Shaw is a social worker who attempts to rescue girls who’ve been trafficked into India’s sex trade. What does her chosen profession reveal about her character? Why is this important within the overall story?

3. “Flash House” is a Victorian term for brothel – or house of prostitution. Kamla escapes from just such a house, but how does the metaphor of the “flash house” reflect other aspects of the novel?

4. Early in the novel, Joanna Shaw’s boss, Hari, lectures her about the horrors India suffered during Partition. “I try to remember what a short time you have been in India,” he tells her, “you have no idea what is rape…” Is this meant as an indictment of American naiveté, or as a plea for help? How does Joanna’s relative unfamiliarity with Asia’s recent history affect her choice to pursue Aidan?

5. Throughout this novel the characters make reference to the Great Game, the historical rivalry between Britain and Russia for control of the northern access routes to the Indian subcontinent. Why and how is the Great Game relevant to the political intrigues that engulf Joanna, Aidan, Kamla, and Lawrence in Sinkiang? Are there parallels you can draw between the Great Game and world political events today?

6. All four of the main characters – Joanna, Lawrence, Simon, and Kamla – live outside their native states and cultures. They are, in effect, stateless, so that this becomes a story about the expatriate experience. In what ways is this a shared experience for all four characters? How and why is this experience different for each of them? How does their mutual statelessness impact their choices and interactions?

7. Absence is a critical theme throughout this story. Aidan’s absence drives Joanna’s actions through much of the novel. Kamla and Simon both are marked by parental absence. Lawrence mourns the loss of his son. What are the effects of absence on the emotions and behavior of the characters?

8. Although the novel is told through alternating chapters in three different voices, the story is bookended by sections written from Kamla’s point of view as an elderly woman. How does this perspective shape the overall story? Why do you think the author selected Kamla rather than Joanna as the primary narrator?

9. Aimee Liu has said that her earliest drafts of FLASH HOUSE were written from the perspective of Simon as a grown man. Why do you think she abandoned this approach? How would it have altered the story for you if Simon had been telling the tale?

10. What questions does the story raise about the impulse to rescue? Is rescue, as described in the story, intrinsically moral, emotional, or pragmatic? What links does the story suggest between acts of rescue and acts of love?

11. In the epilogue Kamla states, “What mattered most in the end was not right or wrong. It was not politics or fidelity or even understanding. Certainly it was not the act of rescue. It was simply our mutual ineptitude at love.” Is Kamla a reliable narrator? What does she mean by “our mutual ineptitude at love”?



CLOUD MOUNTAIN


1. How does Hope’s mixed-race ancestry influence her decision to marry Paul?

2. How does Paul’s revolutionary zeal affect his decision to marry Hope?

3. Why does Paul discourage Hope from writing articles based on the stories he tells her?

4. What does Paul mean when he calls the politics of the early Chinese Republic a “mirror game”?

5. Do Hope and Paul share the same view of Dr. Sun Yat-sen as hero of the Chinese Revolution?

6. Why does Jin become estranged from his father, even as he grows closer to Hope?

7. Why does Hope feel that she can neither trust nor ignore her friend Sarah?

8. Why does Sarah say that race matters more in Shanghai than anywhere else?

9. Why does Hope hate Paul’s pet phrase, “mei fatse”?

10. What does Paul mean when he calls Hope his “middle ground”?

11. Is Hope’s relationship with Stephen Mann an indication of her weakness or her strength?

12. Why does Nai-li insist that Hope be present for her death and funeral?

13. Does Borodin trap Paul, or does Paul allow himself to be placed under house arrest in Wuchang?

14. Why can’t Hope reveal her true role in Paul’s rescue?

15. When does Hope decide what her reply to Paul’s 1939 letter must be?